Listing 1 - 10 of 20 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
#SBIB:054.AANKOOP --- #SBIB:327.5H22 --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- 341.7 --- 341.7 Diplomatiek recht --- Diplomatiek recht --- Ontwapeningsproblemen - bewapening --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- Nuclear nonproliferation --- Diplomacy. --- Diplomacy --- History --- International relations --- NPT Review and Extension Conference --- NPTREC --- Review and Extension Conference, NPT --- Nuclear nonproliferation - Congresses.
Choose an application
World politics --- International relations --- Politique mondiale --- Relations internationales --- History --- Histoire --- International relations. --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- Coexistence --- Foreign affairs --- Foreign policy --- Foreign relations --- Global governance --- Interdependence of nations --- International affairs --- Peaceful coexistence --- World order --- National security --- Sovereignty --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- International Relations --- Diplomacy --- Internationale politiek --- Wereldpolitiek --- Internationale politiek. --- Wereldpolitiek. --- World politics - 1989 --- -World politics
Choose an application
The attacks of September 11 2001 spectacularly demonstrated that America’s main security challenges did not stem from traditional power rivalries but rather from ‘grey areas’, failed or badly governed states which are breeding grounds for extremism. Today the emphasis has shifted from focusing on relations between states to acting directly on states themselves, so as to pre-empt the growth of terrorism, arms proliferation, genocide, civil wars etc. After the concept of the ‘global war on terror’, President George W. Bush put forward his ‘freedom agenda’ aiming to promote democracy as a response to the security challenges facing the world, in particular in the Middle East. But overthrowing tyrants and holding elections is not enough to create a stable and well-governed democracy and can even, in some cases, complicate matters, as events between 2003 and 2005 in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Palestinian Authority and Egypt have shown. This is where ‘transformational diplomacy’, the concept inaug-urated by Condoleezza Rice in early 2006, comes in. Basically this consists in working with the partners of the United States with a view to ‘build and sustain democratic, well-governed states that will respond to the needs of their people and conduct themselves responsibly in the international system.’ To enable this to happen, it is first of all American diplomacy which must transform itself, so as to become less ‘analytical’ and more operational, characterised by direct involvement in foreign societies rather than just being restricted to the realm of foreign policy. This Chaillot Paper explores the scope and limits of this ‘transformative’ action: is the realist paradigm, that of interpower rivalries, really no longer relevant ? Can diplomats transform themselves into active promoters of good governance ? Are other countries ready to accept them in this role, or will they accuse them of interference ? Can transformational diplomacy really change the world ?
Security, International --- Sécurité internationale --- United States --- Etats-Unis --- Foreign relations --- Relations extérieures --- #SBIB:327.5H00 --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- #SBIB:327H15 --- Strategie en vredesonderzoek: algemeen --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- Buitenlandse politiek: Noord-Amerika --- Sécurité internationale --- Relations extérieures
Choose an application
Balance of power --- World politics --- Forecasting --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- World politics. --- Forecasting. --- Colonialism --- Global politics --- International politics --- Political history --- Political science --- World history --- Eastern question --- Geopolitics --- International organization --- International relations --- Power, Balance of --- Power politics --- Political realism --- Balance of power - Forecasting
Choose an application
This book aims to show practice approaches at work in the fields of European diplomacy and security broadly conceived. It sets out to provide readers with a hands-on sense of where research on social practices and European diplomacy, security and foreign policy currently stands. The book reviews how practice approaches have evolved in International Relations (IR) and brings together an unique set of contributions which highlights how insights from practice approaches can be applied to advance research on a number of key issues in these fields. While the debate about practices in IR goes beyond the case of diplomacy, the latter has become a showcase for the former and this book continues the debate on practices and diplomacy by zooming in on the European Union. Examples of issues covered include the evolution of EU-NATO relations seen from the perspective of communities of practice, burden sharing as an anchoring practice for European states’ involvement in crisis management operations, the practical knowledge shaping the EU’s responses to the Arab Uprisings, agency as accomplished in and through EU counter-piracy practices and the political resistance to Israeli occupation and the non-official recognition of Palestine performed by EU diplomats. Thus, by focusing on specific practices and analytical mechanisms that contribute to understand the transformations of European diplomacy, security and foreign policy, this book provides essential readings to anyone interested in innovative ways to grasp the contemporary challenges that face the EU and its member states. The chapters originally published as a special issue of European Security. (Provided by publisher)
European Union --- European Union countries --- Foreign relations --- #SBIB:327.7H233 --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- Europese Unie: externe relaties, buitenlands- en defensiebeleid (ook WEU) --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- European Union. --- E.U. --- Foreign relations. --- European Union countries - Foreign relations
Choose an application
A brilliant account of how the world squandered the opportunities of the post-Cold War era. --
World politics --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- #SBIB:327H10 --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- Buitenlandse politiek: algemeen --- WORLD POLITICS --- International relations. Foreign policy --- anno 1980-1989 --- anno 1990-1999 --- anno 2000-2009 --- anno 2010-2019 --- World politics - 20th century --- World politics - 21st century --- Relations internationales
Choose an application
International economic relations --- Russian Federation --- Russia (Federation) --- Russie --- Foreign relations. --- Relations extérieures --- Foreign relations --- #SBIB:328H262 --- #SBIB:327H13 --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- Instellingen en beleid: Rusland en het GOS --- Buitenlandse politiek: U.S.S.R. / GOS / Russische Federatie --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- -Russia (Federation) --- Russia & Former Soviet Republics --- Regions & Countries - Europe --- History & Archaeology --- -Foreign relations --- Russia --- Relations extérieures --- Russia (Federation) - Foreign relations
Choose an application
All fourteen major peacebuilding missions launched between 1989 and 1999 shared a common strategy for consolidating peace after internal conflicts: immediate democratization and marketization. Transforming war-shattered states into market democracies is basically sound, but pushing this process too quickly can have damaging and destabilizing effects. The process of liberalization is inherently tumultuous, and can undermine the prospects for stable peace. A more sensible approach to post-conflict peacebuilding would seek, first, to establish a system of domestic institutions that are capable of managing the destabilizing effects of democratization and marketization within peaceful bounds and only then phase in political and economic reforms slowly, as conditions warrant. Peacebuilders should establish the foundations of effective governmental institutions prior to launching wholesale liberalization programs. Avoiding the problems that marred many peacebuilding operations in the 1990s will require longer-lasting and, ultimately, more intrusive forms of intervention in the domestic affairs of these states. This book was first published in 2004.
856.6 Vredesopbouw --- 851 Burgeroorlogen --- Polemology --- Peace-building --- Democracy --- Capitalism --- Peace-building. --- Democracy. --- Capitalism. --- Consolidation de la paix --- Démocratie --- Capitalisme --- #SBIB:327.5H20 --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- Building peace --- Peacebuilding --- Conflict management --- Peace --- Peacekeeping forces --- Self-government --- Political science --- Equality --- Representative government and representation --- Republics --- Market economy --- Economics --- Profit --- Capital --- Vredesonderzoek: algemeen --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- Social Sciences --- Political Science
Choose an application
Yugoslav War, 1991-1995 --- Geopolitics --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- #SBIB:327.6H01 --- #SBIB:328H271 --- War in former Yugoslavia, 1991-1995 --- Yugoslav Conflict, 1991-1995 --- Yugoslav Wars of Secession, 1991-1995 --- Yugoslav War Crime Trials, Hague, Netherlands, 1994 --- -Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: specifieke conflicten --- Instellingen en beleid: Balkanstaten: Roemenië, Bulgarije, Ex-Joegoslavië, Albanië e.a --- Yugoslav War (1991-1995) --- Bosnia and Herzegovina --- History
Choose an application
Pendant quarante-cinq ans, le monde a vécu sous la tutelle de deux empires aux ambitions radicalement contradictoires, encore que contraints, par leur commune peur de l'apocalypse nucléaire, à un minimum de complicité. Cette époque est révolue. Le putsch manqué de Moscou a précipité la déroute d'une Union soviétique en passe de perdre jusqu'à son nom.Suivant de près celle qu'il venait de remporter sur l'Irak de Saddam Hussein, c'est pour Georges Bush une formidable victoire: le voilà désormais sans l'autre ", débarrassé de la super-puissance que ses prédécesseurs n'avait cessé, depuis 1945, de trouver en travers de leur route. S'ils conservent, avec le Japon et l'Allemagne, d'opulents rivaux commerciaux, les Etats-Unis n'ont plus pour le moment d'ennemi, et aucun de leurs partenaires ne paraît vraiment de taille à beaucoup influencer leurs décisions.Jamais, au cours des siècles, puissance n'a été aussi près d'exercer l'hégémonie mondiale. Il est grand temps pour l'Europe de se réveiller si elle ne veut pas que le " nouvel ordre international " en gestation consacre son effacement.
International relations. Foreign policy --- Political sociology --- United States --- #SBIB:327.6H30 --- #SBIB:327.6H40 --- #SBIB:031.GIFT --- 973.092 --- 947.098 --- 304 <73> --- 930.9 "18/19" --- 327.54 --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode 1945 - 1989 --- Internationale en diplomatieke relaties: periode na de Koude Oorlog / Val van de Muur --- Géographie économique --- Relations internationales --- Équilibre des puissances --- Grandes puissances --- États-Unis --- URSS --- Politique et gouvernement --- Géographie économique. --- Équilibre des puissances. --- Grandes puissances. --- 936 --- politique --- hedendaagse wereld na 1945 --- temps contemporains après 1945 --- United States of America
Listing 1 - 10 of 20 | << page >> |
Sort by
|